Danep
2007-02-24 17:58:19 UTC
Hi all
Seeing as this group is so quiet I thought that I would officially
announce that I have found the real historical person behind Arthur
and others from his time. I will now just confirm and explain some of
the actual relationships as I have found but I will not as yet reveal
who they were as that must wait for the book.
First and foremost Arthur was a Briton and eventually a King. Arthur
is a title not a name.
Vortigern was a title not a name. Both he and Arthur had a common
ancestor. Hence the early conflicts between Vortigirns side of the
family and Ambrosius'. The two family lines were united later when
Vortimers daughter married Arthurs son. There were actually two
Vortigerns (three if you count the welsh Tradition of Voritgern II,
who I also know the identity of)
Merlin was Arthurs uncle. He was the easiest to find. No great huge
books needed to explain it. Once you know who Arthur and Vortigern are
it all fits in perfectly.
Modred was Merlins son. Modred was a very evil character.
Guinevere was not Arthurs wife but his daughter. She may have been
mixed up with Arthurs second wife by ancient historians. The
mythological arguments between women linked to Arthur is between
daughter and step mother. There is a river in Wales named after a
sister of Arthur.
Arthur had at least two children. His line continued on and many
people today will be related to him. Geneaologies will have to be re-
written.I am working on these.
Ambrosius was Arthurs uncle. It is amazing how much GOM got right in
his writings but I will admit he did hedge his bets somewhat. After
this data is revealed GOM will be taken a bit more seriously.
I am an amateur historian so I dont kow how seriously I will be taken.
I need this information to be verified by a known respected Historian
of the period. If you are reading this and can help please do not
hesitate to contact me.
I have contacted the British Museum historical dept and a couple of
publishers but am waiting to hear back.
If you are reading this and know any of the major authors such as
Peter Beresford Ellis, Chris Snyder, Geofrey Ashe ect can you let them
know about this.
This data is so explosive and important to the history of this country
that it really needs a team of researchers on it as everything will
have to be re-written. It woud take me years to do it. Although I have
identified the main characters there is so much more to do. The
events, battles and movements will have to be co-ordinated with this
new data.
Other discoveries include the identity of Hengist and Horsa, when and
where exactly they arrived etc. Also the real historical identity of
Kynan ap Keradag and possibly also of Eudaf.
Also the meaning of Pendragon, where it came from, when the first
historically known Briton used it and who they were. (not Uther).
I have found so much. But how do I get academics to confirm it?
Regards
Dane
Seeing as this group is so quiet I thought that I would officially
announce that I have found the real historical person behind Arthur
and others from his time. I will now just confirm and explain some of
the actual relationships as I have found but I will not as yet reveal
who they were as that must wait for the book.
First and foremost Arthur was a Briton and eventually a King. Arthur
is a title not a name.
Vortigern was a title not a name. Both he and Arthur had a common
ancestor. Hence the early conflicts between Vortigirns side of the
family and Ambrosius'. The two family lines were united later when
Vortimers daughter married Arthurs son. There were actually two
Vortigerns (three if you count the welsh Tradition of Voritgern II,
who I also know the identity of)
Merlin was Arthurs uncle. He was the easiest to find. No great huge
books needed to explain it. Once you know who Arthur and Vortigern are
it all fits in perfectly.
Modred was Merlins son. Modred was a very evil character.
Guinevere was not Arthurs wife but his daughter. She may have been
mixed up with Arthurs second wife by ancient historians. The
mythological arguments between women linked to Arthur is between
daughter and step mother. There is a river in Wales named after a
sister of Arthur.
Arthur had at least two children. His line continued on and many
people today will be related to him. Geneaologies will have to be re-
written.I am working on these.
Ambrosius was Arthurs uncle. It is amazing how much GOM got right in
his writings but I will admit he did hedge his bets somewhat. After
this data is revealed GOM will be taken a bit more seriously.
I am an amateur historian so I dont kow how seriously I will be taken.
I need this information to be verified by a known respected Historian
of the period. If you are reading this and can help please do not
hesitate to contact me.
I have contacted the British Museum historical dept and a couple of
publishers but am waiting to hear back.
If you are reading this and know any of the major authors such as
Peter Beresford Ellis, Chris Snyder, Geofrey Ashe ect can you let them
know about this.
This data is so explosive and important to the history of this country
that it really needs a team of researchers on it as everything will
have to be re-written. It woud take me years to do it. Although I have
identified the main characters there is so much more to do. The
events, battles and movements will have to be co-ordinated with this
new data.
Other discoveries include the identity of Hengist and Horsa, when and
where exactly they arrived etc. Also the real historical identity of
Kynan ap Keradag and possibly also of Eudaf.
Also the meaning of Pendragon, where it came from, when the first
historically known Briton used it and who they were. (not Uther).
I have found so much. But how do I get academics to confirm it?
Regards
Dane